Crow vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,789,764 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 41.0 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $46,700, a difference of 47.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $104,408, a difference of 40.6%), and wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $40,483, a difference of 14.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,335, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $61,465, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 97.9%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 95.9%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 90.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 232.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 210.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 209.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.7%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.18, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.79%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 58.0%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 55.6%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.15%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 39.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.7%).