Mongolian vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,580,604 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 64.7 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($114,553 compared to $106,942, a difference of 7.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $104,408, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,578 compared to $98,267, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $54,335, a difference of 3.4%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $40,483, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.0%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and male poverty (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.72%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.0%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.070%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.9%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%).