Asian vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,708,632 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $98,267, a difference of 14.6%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $88,934, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $104,408, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.76%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $54,335, a difference of 4.9%), and per capita income ($50,057 compared to $46,700, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.5%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.5%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.0%), family households (66.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.0%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.14%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.3%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.2%).