Fijian vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,706,877 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 22.8 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $46,700, a difference of 27.3%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $56,837, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $98,267, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $61,465, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $54,335, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $40,483, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 21.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (46.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 84.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.5%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.41%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.6%).