Immigrants from Central America vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,802,510 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.683. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $46,700, a difference of 33.5%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $106,942, a difference of 25.7%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $56,837, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $54,335, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $61,465, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 47.9%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.7%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.17%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (44.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 57.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 75.3%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 75.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 73.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.9%).