Laotian vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Arapaho
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,455,973 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.982. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.210% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 209.8 Arapaho.
Laotian vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $71,697, a difference of 46.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $75,945, a difference of 46.2%), and per capita income ($47,041 compared to $32,345, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $59,383, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $44,003, a difference of 23.6%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Laotian vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 85.0%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 59.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 24.0%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Arapaho |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Laotian vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 191.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 145.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 137.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Laotian vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 77.1% |
Laotian vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 65.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 32.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.64, a difference of 11.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Arapaho |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 47.1% |
Laotian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.7%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 23.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Laotian vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 97.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 82.4%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.19%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and high school diploma (89.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.81%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.2% |
Laotian vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 48.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Arapaho |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |