Laotian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,666,017 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $98,586, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.1%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $56,302, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.69%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $110,011, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.5%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.1%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (65.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.77%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.6%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.35%).