Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Immigrants from Ecuador

Good
Poor
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,212,982 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 21.2 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Laotian Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $54,030, a difference of 22.7%), median family income ($112,859 compared to $92,837, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $91,462, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $53,722, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $38,644, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $44,462, a difference of 13.2%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricLaotianImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Exceptional
22.5%

Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 43.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.39%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.1%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.0%

Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%

Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
82.2%

Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
33.7%

Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 163.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 74.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 44.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 60.5%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.2%

Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.8%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.93%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricLaotianImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%