Laotian vs Ghanaian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Ghanaian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Ghanaians
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ghanaian Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,065,109 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 68.6 Ghanaians.
Laotian vs Ghanaian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $90,137, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $97,277, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $52,594, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $40,429, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $46,440, a difference of 8.4%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Ghanaian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Poor $42,164 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Poor $98,877 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Fair $83,582 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Average $46,440 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Poor $52,810 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Excellent $40,429 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Good $52,594 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $90,137 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Poor $97,277 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Fair $60,043 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Laotian vs Ghanaian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 31.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.6%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Ghanaian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Poor 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Laotian vs Ghanaian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Ghanaian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Laotian vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Ghanaian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Good 83.0% |
Laotian vs Ghanaian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.83%), and family households (65.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Ghanaian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 42.2% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 34.3% |
Laotian vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 81.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Ghanaian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 83.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Tragic 48.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Laotian vs Ghanaian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Ghanaian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 87.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 84.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Fair 58.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Average 1.8% |
Laotian vs Ghanaian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Ghanaian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Poor 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Average 2.5% |