Laotian vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Creek
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,240,781 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.797% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 5,797.2 Creek.
Laotian vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $78,960, a difference of 40.6%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $67,715, a difference of 40.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $74,847, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.8%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $33,437, a difference of 26.0%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Laotian vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 64.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 25.9%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Creek |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Laotian vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.15%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Creek |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Laotian vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 77.7% |
Laotian vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 32.0%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.8%), family households (65.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Creek |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 37.6% |
Laotian vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Laotian vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 71.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.4%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Laotian vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 67.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.7%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Creek |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |