Laotian vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,588,663 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.609. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.268% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 268.1 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 13.6%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $37,904, a difference of 11.2%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $85,681, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $51,493, a difference of 5.6%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $55,731, a difference of 6.5%), and per capita income ($47,041 compared to $44,076, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.1%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.85%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.5% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.64%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.6%).