Laotian vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,153,778 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.111% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 111.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $84,235, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $90,691, a difference of 22.5%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $77,631, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $38,391, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $48,691, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $44,118, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 41.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.4%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 28.7%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (65.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.3%).