Laotian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,917,060 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.530% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 530.1 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $91,385, a difference of 21.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $86,736, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $78,682, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $38,028, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $48,749, a difference of 11.5%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $43,998, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 38.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 35.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.99%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (65.8% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.2%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.010%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.3%).