Laotian vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,740,288 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.185% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 1,184.7 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,859 compared to $100,962, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $94,423, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $59,656, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $53,201, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $39,328, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 30.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.46%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.5%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.2%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.76%).