Laotian vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,892,725 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.168% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 167.9 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $39,826, a difference of 18.1%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $51,389, a difference of 15.5%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $44,206, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $54,610, a difference of 0.44%), householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $65,427, a difference of 1.3%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.8% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.9%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.7%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.5%).