Laotian vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Cypriots

Good
Excellent
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,476,680 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 13.2 Cypriots.
Laotian Integration in Cypriot Communities

Laotian vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $54,899, a difference of 16.7%), median family income ($112,859 compared to $127,064, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $123,396, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $52,209, a difference of 4.1%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $45,570, a difference of 8.2%).
Laotian vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricLaotianCypriot
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Laotian vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 13.8%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Laotian vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianCypriot
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
8.9%

Laotian vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.93%).
Laotian vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianCypriot
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Laotian vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Laotian vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
84.1%

Laotian vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.76%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.7%).
Laotian vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianCypriot
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
27.0%

Laotian vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 72.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 29.4%).
Laotian vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.0%

Laotian vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.3%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Laotian vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Laotian vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Laotian vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricLaotianCypriot
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%