Laotian vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,140,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 46.4 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $57,953, a difference of 23.2%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $67,634, a difference of 14.0%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $126,620, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $56,660, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $69,164, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.9%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.50%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.7%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.83%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.7%).