Laotian vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,972,430 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.871. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.429% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 429.4 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $85,787, a difference of 29.4%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $73,747, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $82,152, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $47,518, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $35,661, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 43.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 40.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 29.0%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.9%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 45.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 8.0%).