Laotian vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Serbians

Good
Excellent
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,877,446 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.759. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.122% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 121.9 Serbians.
Laotian Integration in Serbian Communities

Laotian vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $61,087, a difference of 8.5%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $87,572, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $103,522, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,041 compared to $46,551, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $57,975, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $48,677, a difference of 3.4%).
Laotian vs Serbian Income
Income MetricLaotianSerbian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
27.7%

Laotian vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.51%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Laotian vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianSerbian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%

Laotian vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Laotian vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianSerbian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Laotian vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.86%).
Laotian vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Laotian vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.1%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.74%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Laotian vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianSerbian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Good
30.7%

Laotian vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.42%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Laotian vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Poor
6.0%

Laotian vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Laotian vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.0%

Laotian vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.26%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Laotian vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricLaotianSerbian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%