Laotian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,692,358 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $75,240, a difference of 26.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $88,390, a difference of 25.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $84,461, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $36,034, a difference of 16.9%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $50,292, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.45%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.34%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.1%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.4%).