Laotian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,308,158 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 40.8 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $83,937, a difference of 32.3%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $72,402, a difference of 31.2%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $87,596, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $49,997, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $34,960, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 60.0%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.2%), bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 35.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 42.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.030%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.6%).