Laotian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,265,168 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 26.1 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $97,623, a difference of 7.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $103,705, a difference of 7.1%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $89,100, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $64,416, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.8%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.77%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.8%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), and 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.27%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%).