Laotian vs Swedish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Swedes

Good
Excellent
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swedish Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,486,384 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.190% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 190.0 Swedes.
Laotian Integration in Swedish Communities

Laotian vs Swedish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 11.6%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $88,524, a difference of 7.3%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $39,421, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $52,986, a difference of 2.6%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $45,750, a difference of 2.8%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $57,445, a difference of 3.3%).
Laotian vs Swedish Income
Income MetricLaotianSwedish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Exceptional
$45,750
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Exceptional
$108,499
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Exceptional
$88,524
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Excellent
$47,851
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Exceptional
$57,445
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Fair
$39,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Excellent
$52,986
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Exceptional
$99,136
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Exceptional
$106,377
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Excellent
$62,736
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
29.4%

Laotian vs Swedish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Laotian vs Swedish Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianSwedish
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.2%

Laotian vs Swedish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.4%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Laotian vs Swedish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianSwedish
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Laotian vs Swedish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 26.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Laotian vs Swedish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianSwedish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
44.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.7%

Laotian vs Swedish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Laotian vs Swedish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianSwedish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
29.6%

Laotian vs Swedish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Laotian vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianSwedish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Exceptional
61.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.6%

Laotian vs Swedish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.89%).
Laotian vs Swedish Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianSwedish
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.0%

Laotian vs Swedish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.050%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Laotian vs Swedish Disability
Disability MetricLaotianSwedish
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%