Laotian vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Potawatomi

Good
Fair
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,137,224 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 49.4 Potawatomi.
Laotian Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Laotian vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $84,613, a difference of 31.2%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $72,576, a difference of 30.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $81,774, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $46,462, a difference of 17.0%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $34,739, a difference of 21.3%).
Laotian vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricLaotianPotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
27.7%

Laotian vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 42.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.1%).
Laotian vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianPotawatomi
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
12.5%

Laotian vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 46.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Laotian vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianPotawatomi
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Laotian vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Laotian vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianPotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
80.0%

Laotian vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 27.3%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (65.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Laotian vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianPotawatomi
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
36.2%

Laotian vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Laotian vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianPotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.3%

Laotian vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.8%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.3%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.22%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Laotian vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianPotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Laotian vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 45.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 42.4%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%).
Laotian vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricLaotianPotawatomi
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%