Laotian vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,337,904 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.789% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 788.7 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $97,159, a difference of 8.1%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $88,388, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $103,412, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,041 compared to $46,213, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $52,440, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.91%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 9.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.68%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (65.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.6%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.6%), bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.10%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.60%).