Laotian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,522,814 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 58.8 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.0%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $49,448, a difference of 5.1%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $61,228, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $42,108, a difference of 0.060%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $105,223, a difference of 0.22%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $93,852, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.25%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.2%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.7%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.60%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.7%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and high school diploma (89.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.8% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.060%), college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.5%).