Laotian vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cape Verdean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Cape Verdeans

Good
Poor
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cape Verdean Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,236,642 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 22.7 Cape Verdeans.
Laotian Integration in Cape Verdean Communities

Laotian vs Cape Verdean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $50,077, a difference of 32.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $87,580, a difference of 26.8%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $75,848, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $51,387, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $38,614, a difference of 9.1%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 11.8%).
Laotian vs Cape Verdean Income
Income MetricLaotianCape Verdean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$39,935
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Tragic
$91,848
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Tragic
$75,848
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Tragic
$44,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Tragic
$51,103
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Tragic
$38,614
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Poor
$51,387
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Tragic
$85,758
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Tragic
$87,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$50,077
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Exceptional
23.6%

Laotian vs Cape Verdean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 111.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.4%).
Laotian vs Cape Verdean Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianCape Verdean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
21.1%

Laotian vs Cape Verdean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.5%).
Laotian vs Cape Verdean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianCape Verdean
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
10.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%

Laotian vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Laotian vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianCape Verdean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
44.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
82.1%

Laotian vs Cape Verdean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 51.9%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 45.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households (65.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Laotian vs Cape Verdean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianCape Verdean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
38.1%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
39.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
41.3%

Laotian vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 71.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 67.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.4%).
Laotian vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianCape Verdean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
84.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
46.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
15.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.4%

Laotian vs Cape Verdean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.5%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.0%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.89%).
Laotian vs Cape Verdean Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianCape Verdean
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
95.5%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
95.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
94.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
90.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
87.4%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
80.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
56.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
50.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
38.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Laotian vs Cape Verdean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 4.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 11.2%).
Laotian vs Cape Verdean Disability
Disability MetricLaotianCape Verdean
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%