Laotian vs English Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,796,936 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of English within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.133% in English. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 133.1 English.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and English communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $84,915, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $94,429, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $55,747, a difference of 6.5%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $43,982, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $50,805, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and English communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and English communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and English communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and English communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and English communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and English communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 60.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and English communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.1%).