Laotian vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,331,051 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.394% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 393.9 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $83,193, a difference of 14.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $92,241, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $98,896, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $50,447, a difference of 7.8%), and per capita income ($47,041 compared to $43,621, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.6%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 17.0%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.5% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.2%).