Laotian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,580,059 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.917. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.160% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 1,160.4 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $86,418, a difference of 9.9%), householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $60,967, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $97,237, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,041 compared to $45,663, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $56,300, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.95%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.4%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.10, a difference of 5.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 69.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.81%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.0%).