Laotian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,347,229 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 95.3 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $62,522, a difference of 6.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $99,232, a difference of 5.8%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $90,026, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $42,084, a difference of 0.12%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $46,531, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $49,648, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.72%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.1%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 39.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.23%).