Laotian vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,623,330 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.639% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 638.5 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.7%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $42,694, a difference of 10.2%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $54,958, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $103,954, a difference of 1.0%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $93,933, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $41,656, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.71%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.7%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.30%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 33.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%).