Laotian vs Menominee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Menominee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Menominee

Good
Fair
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Menominee Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,401,406 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.242% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 242.5 Menominee.
Laotian Integration in Menominee Communities

Laotian vs Menominee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $76,903, a difference of 44.4%), median family income ($112,859 compared to $79,563, a difference of 41.8%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $42,581, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $47,907, a difference of 13.5%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $33,894, a difference of 24.3%).
Laotian vs Menominee Income
Income MetricLaotianMenominee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$34,578
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Tragic
$79,563
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Tragic
$68,423
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Tragic
$37,884
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Tragic
$42,581
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Tragic
$33,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Tragic
$47,907
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Tragic
$79,358
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Tragic
$76,903
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$51,719
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Exceptional
22.7%

Laotian vs Menominee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 72.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 72.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.0%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.3%).
Laotian vs Menominee Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianMenominee
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
23.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
25.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
27.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Tragic
37.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
17.2%

Laotian vs Menominee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 120.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 73.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Laotian vs Menominee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianMenominee
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
11.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
5.6%

Laotian vs Menominee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Laotian vs Menominee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianMenominee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
60.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
33.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
68.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
77.4%

Laotian vs Menominee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 89.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 79.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Laotian vs Menominee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianMenominee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.30
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
42.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
51.1%

Laotian vs Menominee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 48.4%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 25.2%).
Laotian vs Menominee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianMenominee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.0%

Laotian vs Menominee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 70.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.1%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Laotian vs Menominee Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianMenominee
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
57.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
50.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Laotian vs Menominee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 87.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 57.2%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 9.2%).
Laotian vs Menominee Disability
Disability MetricLaotianMenominee
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
27.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
52.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.8%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%