Laotian vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,971,682 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.160% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 160.2 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $97,336, a difference of 7.9%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $88,398, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $62,266, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $45,662, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $40,718, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.2%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%).