Laotian vs Yuman Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Yuman
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Yuman
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yuman Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,082,397 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 38.5 Yuman.
Laotian vs Yuman Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,859 compared to $78,055, a difference of 44.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $72,956, a difference of 43.9%), and per capita income ($47,041 compared to $33,236, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $50,933, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $35,377, a difference of 19.1%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Yuman |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $33,236 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $78,055 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Tragic $68,743 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $39,523 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $45,446 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Tragic $35,377 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Tragic $50,933 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $72,956 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $82,139 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $53,110 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 23.3% |
Laotian vs Yuman Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 114.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 106.6%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 25.1%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Yuman |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 20.2% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 16.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 24.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 28.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 30.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 27.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 29.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 28.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 37.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 15.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 20.2% |
Laotian vs Yuman Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 269.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 124.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 117.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Yuman |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 8.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 37.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 11.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 9.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Laotian vs Yuman Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 8.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Yuman |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 57.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 71.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Tragic 27.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 70.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 76.3% |
Laotian vs Yuman Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 65.3%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 55.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (65.8% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.47, a difference of 6.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Yuman |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.47 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.6% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 44.4% |
Laotian vs Yuman Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 63.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Yuman |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 85.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Tragic 51.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Good 19.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Laotian vs Yuman Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 84.3%), bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 71.1%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Yuman |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Tragic 93.8% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 92.0% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Tragic 89.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 86.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 84.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 79.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 55.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 31.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Laotian vs Yuman Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 69.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 56.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Yuman |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 0.95% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 31.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 54.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |