Laotian vs Yuman Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yuman
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Yuman

Good
Tragic
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yuman Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,082,397 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 38.5 Yuman.
Laotian Integration in Yuman Communities

Laotian vs Yuman Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,859 compared to $78,055, a difference of 44.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $72,956, a difference of 43.9%), and per capita income ($47,041 compared to $33,236, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $50,933, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $35,377, a difference of 19.1%).
Laotian vs Yuman Income
Income MetricLaotianYuman
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$33,236
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Tragic
$78,055
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Tragic
$68,743
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Tragic
$39,523
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Tragic
$45,446
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Tragic
$35,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Tragic
$50,933
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Tragic
$72,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Tragic
$82,139
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$53,110
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Exceptional
23.3%

Laotian vs Yuman Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 114.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 106.6%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 25.1%).
Laotian vs Yuman Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianYuman
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
16.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
24.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
28.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
27.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
29.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Tragic
37.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.2%

Laotian vs Yuman Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 269.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 124.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 117.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.5%).
Laotian vs Yuman Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianYuman
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
37.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
9.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%

Laotian vs Yuman Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 8.6%).
Laotian vs Yuman Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianYuman
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
57.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
27.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
70.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
76.3%

Laotian vs Yuman Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 65.3%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 55.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (65.8% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.47, a difference of 6.4%).
Laotian vs Yuman Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianYuman
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
44.4%

Laotian vs Yuman Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 63.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
Laotian vs Yuman Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianYuman
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
85.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.5%

Laotian vs Yuman Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 84.3%), bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 71.1%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Laotian vs Yuman Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianYuman
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
92.0%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Tragic
89.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
86.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
84.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
79.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
55.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
48.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
31.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Laotian vs Yuman Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 69.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 56.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Laotian vs Yuman Disability
Disability MetricLaotianYuman
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
31.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
54.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%