Laotian vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,116,941 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 56.3 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $84,401, a difference of 24.4%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $78,529, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $93,718, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 10.0%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $38,215, a difference of 10.2%), and per capita income ($47,041 compared to $41,695, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.5%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.82%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.0%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.72%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%).