Laotian vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,026,679 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 116.7 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $96,667, a difference of 8.6%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $87,557, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $40,889, a difference of 3.0%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $45,047, a difference of 4.4%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $47,854, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 52.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.5%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.0%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.77%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.8%).