Laotian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,858,943 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 78.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $51,770, a difference of 10.1%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $62,217, a difference of 4.8%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $52,361, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $66,376, a difference of 0.11%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $95,319, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.32%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.28%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.0%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.6%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.4%).