Brazilian vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Turks

Good
Exceptional
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,320,542 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 11.4 Turks.
Brazilian Integration in Turkish Communities

Brazilian vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($106,942 compared to $121,202, a difference of 13.3%), median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $64,253, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $117,814, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $54,266, a difference of 0.13%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $44,695, a difference of 10.4%).
Brazilian vs Turkish Income
Income MetricBrazilianTurkish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Brazilian vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Brazilian vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianTurkish
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Brazilian vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Brazilian vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianTurkish
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Brazilian vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Brazilian vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.8%

Brazilian vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.58%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.82%).
Brazilian vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianTurkish
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
27.4%

Brazilian vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Brazilian vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Brazilian vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Brazilian vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.7%

Brazilian vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Brazilian vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianTurkish
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%