Ugandan vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,915,235 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.511. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 24.9 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $52,391, a difference of 16.3%), median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $64,253, a difference of 16.2%), and wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $54,266, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $44,695, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $68,037, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 29.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (61.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.7%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%).