Burmese vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 260,160,408 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $68,037, a difference of 4.6%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $99,389, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $117,814, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $44,695, a difference of 0.48%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $52,391, a difference of 0.74%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $54,266, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.1%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.5%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (48.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.1%), college, 1 year or more (66.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and college, under 1 year (71.9% compared to 70.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.74%).