French Canadian vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French Canadians

Turks

Average
Exceptional
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in French Canadian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,583,963 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Turks.
French Canadian Integration in Turkish Communities

French Canadian vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $52,391, a difference of 21.8%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $99,389, a difference of 20.0%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $121,202, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,266, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $44,695, a difference of 16.3%).
French Canadian vs Turkish Income
Income MetricFrench CanadianTurkish
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,003
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,634
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,810
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,026
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,722
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,436
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,672
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,694
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,093
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,975
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.7%

French Canadian vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
French Canadian vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench CanadianTurkish
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Exceptional
9.5%

French Canadian vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.96%).
French Canadian vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench CanadianTurkish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.2%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

French Canadian vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 23.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
French Canadian vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench CanadianTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Exceptional
83.8%

French Canadian vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 25.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.070%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
French Canadian vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench CanadianTurkish
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.07
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
27.4%

French Canadian vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 48.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.6%).
French Canadian vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench CanadianTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%

French Canadian vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 49.6%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (95.3% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
French Canadian vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench CanadianTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.2%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.9%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.7%

French Canadian vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.1%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 12.8%).
French Canadian vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricFrench CanadianTurkish
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%