Crow vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,610,574 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 16.6 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $52,391, a difference of 65.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $117,814, a difference of 58.7%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $121,202, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,266, a difference of 15.4%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $44,695, a difference of 26.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $68,037, a difference of 38.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 121.6%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 114.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 36.7%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 41.5%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 267.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 232.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 227.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 77.8%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.26%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 96.5%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 87.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.27%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 51.5%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 8.6%).