French vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,494,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,685 compared to $52,391, a difference of 19.9%), median household income ($83,468 compared to $99,389, a difference of 19.1%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $121,202, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $54,266, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $68,037, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and single male poverty (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.58%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 21.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.5%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%).