Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Turks

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,758,107 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 65.7 Turks.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Turkish Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $110,318, a difference of 12.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $117,814, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $64,253, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $54,266, a difference of 4.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $68,037, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $44,695, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweTurkish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.73%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweTurkish
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweTurkish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.5%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.81%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweTurkish
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
27.4%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.33%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweTurkish
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%