Immigrants from Belarus vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,437,131 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 73.2 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $68,037, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and median family income ($114,586 compared to $121,202, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $44,695, a difference of 0.14%), median earnings ($53,043 compared to $53,919, a difference of 1.7%), and median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $64,253, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.6%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.52%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.6%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), family households (63.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.4%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.4%).