Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,510,968 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 7.0 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $64,253, a difference of 7.3%), median household income ($106,057 compared to $99,389, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $54,266, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,660 compared to $52,391, a difference of 0.51%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $68,037, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $44,695, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.8%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.67%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.2%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.58%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 36.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.5%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.4% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.1%), male disability (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.3%).