Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,899,204 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to an increase of 9.8 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,288 compared to $117,814, a difference of 24.9%), median household income ($79,888 compared to $99,389, a difference of 24.4%), and median family income ($97,432 compared to $121,202, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,565 compared to $54,266, a difference of 7.3%), wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($38,886 compared to $44,695, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.44%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (61.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.97%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 59.4%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 55.1%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.2%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.8%).