Immigrants from Guatemala vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,444,710 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 53.1 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $87,751, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $92,554, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $49,215, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $54,474, a difference of 0.97%), householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $53,275, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $36,904, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.5%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and associate's degree (38.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.8%).