Immigrants from Central America vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,639,572 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $39,372, a difference of 12.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $87,751, a difference of 9.7%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $36,904, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $54,474, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $53,275, a difference of 4.4%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 17.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and single female poverty (24.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.70%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.7%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (68.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.79%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.2%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.63%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%).